Meet Fordham's new HASTAC Scholars!

Congratulations to Alisa and Will – we look forward to working with you and seeing your development in the Digital Humanities this year!

The HASTAC program is a program of the Fordham Digital Humanities Working Group. Funding for the 2013-2014 year was provided through the generous support of the Dean of Fordham College at Rose Hill. For further information about the HASTAC program, see the HASTAC At Fordham page.

Alisa Beer

Photo of Alisa Beer

Alisa is a second year Ph.D. student in the History department at Fordham University, where she studies medieval manuscript culture and medieval pilgrimage.  She holds an M.L.S. from the School of Library and Information Science of Indiana University Bloomington, and is particularly interested in information visualization, pedagogy, and the use of social media for scholarship.  She is also concerned about the long-term survival of DH projects and the condition of their metadata.

Will Fenton

Photo of Will Fenton

Will is a Ph.D. Candidate in English at Fordham University, where he specializes in nineteenth century American literature and the Digital Humanities. In addition to writing and blogging about technology, Will is the recipient of a Fordham Innovative Pedagogy Initiative Grant.

First Meeting of GSDH Group 9/25

The Fordham Graduate Student Digital Humanities Group announces its first meeting, to be held on September 25, 12:30-2:00, Dealy 115. This group is open to all graduate students and any interested faculty or staff. Please join us so you can:

  • Learn more about the methods and practices of the digital humanities, an area of study that is growing in importance for all humanities scholars;
  • Discover the digital projects that your peers are working on;
  • Learn how you can create born-digital projects;
  • Learn how to use digital tools for teaching;
  • Participate in workshops;
  • Attend lectures with special guest speakers;
  • Share your knowledge about using technology for research and teaching;
  • Ask your questions about the digital humanities.

Current plans for Fall 2013:

  • 9/25 12:30-2:00, Dealy 115: Come to our planning meeting and contribute your ideas!
  • Workshop, November 13, 2:30-4:30, Keating 318: “Using Prezi for Visual Composition and Dynamic Electronic Posters,” with Prof. Kimon Keramidas of the Bard Graduate Center
  • Time TBA Book group discussions: Matthew Jockers, Macroanalysis & Anne Burdick, et al, Digital_Humanities
  • Time TBA Workshop, “Adapting the Programming Historian for Your Research,” Patrick J. Burns, Teaching Associate, Classics

In addition…

  • Attend the inaugural meeting of the NYC Digital Humanities group. September 28, all day.
  • THATCamp Digital Writing will take place May 2-3, 2013

Follow us on Facebook!
Stay updated here with our blog.

We hope to see you on September 25th!

Highlights from 2012-13

The development and use of digital tools for research, publishing, and pedagogy are increasingly becoming an important part of academic life, not just for digital humanists but for anyone working in the humanities. The Fordham Graduate Student Digital Humanities Group was formed in 2012 to discuss and learn about practices and methodologies in the digital humanities, particularly in the contexts of graduate studies and professionalization.

This group is of special interest to students who are preparing for a professional academic career in the humanities, a career that most likely will require digital fluency in regards to their teaching, research, and publishing. The Fordham GSDH Group welcomes students from all disciplines. No experience using digital tools or methods is required. What we do want is your willingness to learn and participate. Share with others what you know and what you want to learn.

During the 2012-13 academic year, the Fordham GSDH Group organized over a dozen events, including several workshops, a reading group, one field trip, and hosted a guest lecturer. These events were open to the entire campus community and offered faculty, staff, and graduate students the opportunity to meet with people outside their disciplines and get better acquainted with members from their own departments. We will continue our activities this year.

What follows is a recap of some of last year’s many highlights. A complete description of all our activities can be read in more detail here, at the Fordham GSDH Group website.

Fall semester began with the training workshop, “Digital Pedagogy: What Is It? How Do You Do It?” Three graduate students each led a brief, hands-on demonstration. Patrick Burns, a PhD candidate in Classics, opened with “Eliminating the Handout: Paperless Teaching and the Less-Paper Reality.” Patrick acknowledged that a paperless class may not be for everyone, but he also pointed out that less paper, not more, is becoming the reality as more students embrace laptops and tablets. He offered suggestions for giving online quizzes and how to encourage students to take good electronic notes.

Elizabeth Cornell, at the time of the workshop a Pre-Doctoral Teaching Fellow in English, followed with “Five Easy Ways to Incorporate Digital Tools into the College Classroom.” She shared her teaching strategies for helping students develop expertise with digital tools, including WordPress, Zotero, Prezi, GoogleDrive. In her classes, she places emphasis on digital media and technology that students will most likely need to know in the real world and that can be useful in other classes, too.

In his talk, “From Public Course Blogs to Grand, Aggregated Experiments,” Will Fenton, PhD Candidate in English, offered an informative overview of the Digital Humanities and Pedagogy course that he took at CUNY’s Grad Center in the fall semester. The course covers many things, from gaining proficiency in USC’s Hypercities mapping program to participating in the ongoing debate about whether humanities people should learn to code. Will’s description of his class left many of us wishing we’d signed up for the course, too.

Many workshop participants were encountering these digital humanities methods and practices for the first time. Their reservations about trying out new things in their classrooms led Patrick to remark that it’s “important for all of us to maintain an open discussion of successes and failures as we adopt the tools and strategies of digital pedagogy.”

Open discussion of success and failure: That’s a leading tenet of the digital humanities and one of the main reasons why our group exists.

And so the Fordham GSDH Group continued its open discussion in November, with “You Online: Developing Your Online Academic Presence.” This workshop was led by Michael Mandiberg, author of The Social Media Reader and a teacher at the College of Staten Island and the CUNY Graduate Center. An audience of over 50 graduate students, faculty, and administrators discovered how important it is for people working in academia to cultivate their online presence. A strong online presence is particularly critical for graduate students and new tenure track teachers who need to make connections with people in their field and promote their work. Mandiberg gave step-by-step instructions for how to effectively use WordPress for professional promotion, or “branding.” Given that the workshop took place only a couple of days after Hurricane Sandy hit, everyone was very pleased with the turnout. Elizabeth Cornell coordinated the event, working closely with Nicol Gotsis, Director of Student Development at the GSAS.

Members of the Fordham GSDH began the spring semester by becoming citizen cartographers, as this report explained back in February 2013:

What do you do with a growing collection of international maps that contains over 433,000 sheet maps and 20,000 book atlases, some of which date back to the 15th century? Twelve graduate students and one post-doc from Fordham University recently learned that you digitize it, of course. At the New York Public Library’s Lionel Pincus and Princess Firyal Map Division, the effort to digitize thousands of maps has begun with some New York City and antiquarian maps. But more than just make high-resolution images of these maps, the library also developed “Map Warper,” a tool which allows anyone with a computer and an internet connection to digitally align (also known as “rectify”) these maps to match today’s precise maps, using online maps such as OpenStreetMap and GoogleEarth. This mapping  project joins “What’s On the Menu,” another fabulous digital crowdsourcing project at the library.

On a grey February day, our small group from Fordham assembled at the Research Library on 42nd St. to learn how to use MapWarper and become what the library calls “Citizen Cartographers.” The patient and delightful Mishka Vance, a technical assistant at the library, used a digitized, early twentieth-century Bronx fire map to demonstrate how to digitally trace buildings, add information about them (brick, wood, or stone? residence or business?) to the database, and rectify the old map with a contemporary one.

Participants then proceeded to trace and rectify maps of their own choosing from the library’s digitized collection. Our group rectified several maps that day, including an early postal map from the Midwest, an ancient map of Cyprus, and a 1916 survey of Morningside Heights.

Workshop participants represented several departments, including English, Classics, Theology, and Medieval Studies. They came for reasons that ranged from using Map Warper in their research, to using it in their teaching, to simply adding to their knowledge base of digital tools.

As the trip to the NYPL demonstrates, one of the major aims of the Fordham GSDH Group is to help navigate what seems like a vast and overwhelming digital humanities tent, filled with tools and lots of people with ideas about how to use them. The easier path would be to find some pleasant campfire close by and toast marshmallows. But as 15 Fordham University faculty and graduate students learned during the Omeka workshop on April 3, the barrier to entry into the tent is quite low. Alex Gil, Columbia University’s Digital Scholarship Coordinator, did a terrific job leading the workshop.

Omeka, as Wikipedia defines it, is a free, open source, content management system for online collections. It was developed by the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University. The Andrew Mellon Foundation gave Omeka’s developers a technology collaboration award. Omeka is used by researchers, archivists, museum curators, students, and teachers to curate digitized content, using images, text, and metadata.

For this workshop, Alex showed us a few notable sites–or exhibits, as they’re called–that use Omeka, including “Lincoln at 200,” a collaborative project involving the Newberry Library, the Chicago History Museum, and the Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission. Then he carefully walked us through the procedure for starting an Omeka exhibit. Workshop participants brought a diverse collection of material to work on, including French medieval manuscripts, pre-Columbian art, and a personal photograph album. The group felt so enthusiastic about the session, that we may ask Alex back for a second workshop on building exhibits in Omeka.

We look forward to more great events in the 2013-14 academic year. In fact, we’ve already got a few things planned: Patrick Burns will lead a discussion on Matthew Jockers’ book, Macroanalysis. Elizabeth Cornell will lead a GSAS-sponsored workshop on using Zotero for teaching and research. In the spring, THATCamp Digital Writing will be coming to Fordham. Come to our first meeting in September! Date TBA soon.

 

 

 

FGSDH Summer Reading Group—Jockers' Macroanalysis

Now that we’ve had some time to wind down from the Spring semester and settle into Summer, I would like to announce formally the selection for the FGSDH Summer Reading Group: Matthew Jockers‘s Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History (U. Illinois Press)

Image

At the Digital Classics Association conference in Buffalo this April, I was lucky enough to share a panel on “Literary Criticism and Digital Methods” with Prof. Jockers. My paper was about studying patterns of alliteration in Latin poetry and his about sentiment analysis in Irish-American literature, but both talks discussed the importance of using “distant reading” techniques (to use the term that Franco Moretti coined as a challenge to the literary critical commonplace of “close reading.”) That is, we both dealt, for the most part, with techniques which use algorithmic means of textual analysis, leveraging the power, speed and efficiency of computers to treat vast amounts of literary data.

Dealing with literature on this sort of scale is becoming more and more common and opens up for scholars new research opportunities and interpretative possibilities. As Moretti points out in Graphs, Maps, Trees, a student of 19th-century British novels *cannot* possibly read the 20-30,000 novels (so he guesses) published during this time: “…Close reading won’t help here, a novel a day every day of the year would take a century or so.” (4) *Macroanalysis* offers a challenge to literary criticism’s “disciplinary habit of thinking small” by demonstrating both the technology available for dealing with literature on a previously unimaginable scale as well as examples of what sorts of research questions—and subsequent interpretation—this technology makes possible. When literature can be seen from the macroanalytic perspective, “the very object of analysis shifts from looking at the individual occurrences of a feature in context to looking at the trends and patterns of that feature aggregated over an entire corpus.” (24-25)

In a recent Inside Higher Ed review, Scott McLemee characterized these sorts of algorithmic criticism, i.e. Jockers’ “macroanalysis”— as “either promising or menacing.” Such polarizing potential makes the book a perfect introduction to the technical possibilities and critical issues in the cutting edge of digital literary methods as well as a great follow up to our Spring Reading Group’s selection, Prof. Stephen Ramsay’s Reading Machines

Our Summer Reading Group will be a virtual and distributed—that is to say, we will each read the book on our own. (That said, feel free to get together and discuss the book, comment below, tweet your thoughts, etc.) We will schedule a discussion of the book for our first meeting in the Fall. I am also putting together a practicum for the Fall that will allow each of us to learn and practice some macroanalytic skills. Enjoy the book, enjoy the summer. See you in the Fall for what I’m sure will be a lively discussion of Jockers’ book.

Getting DH Fever

(Reposted from maryannemyers.org)DHwordle3

Throughout this academic year I have been hovering around the Digital Humanities (DH), trying to see what it is all about and whether I might get involved.  I have learned a lot from Fordham DH-pioneers Elizabeth Cornell and Patrick Burns, who lead the grad student DH group; I participated in the Digital Pedagogy unconference workshop at MLA; and I incorporated ideas from Cathy Davidson’s Now You See It into my classes.  Finally, as of last week, I can say “I get it.” My former obstacle is now my motivational challenge:  I am going to learn to code.

Two inspiring events at Fordham last week have forged my commitment.  The first was a lecture on “Teaching to the Network” May 1 by Matt Gold, an associate professor and person of many titles at CUNY, as well as editor of Debates in the Digital Humanities, a collection of essays published in 2012.  Gold showed and described projects such as Looking for Whitman, which created “permeable classroom walls” and brought together students studying Whitman in New York City; Washington, D.C.; Camden, N.J.; and Novi Sad, Serbia.  Gold’s other examples–including DS 106, a digital storytelling class; Dialogues on Feminism and Technology; and Davidson’s plan to offer a Coursera MOOC on “The Future of Higher Education”–drove home to me the point that DH can be connective, creative, subversive, and consoling, much like the literature I have read, studied, loved, and taught.

I am a Romanticist, with all of the ambivalences and ambiguities that vexed term embraces.  Call me parochial, but it was the Keats-Shelley Association of America symposium, “Romantic Manuscripts in a Digital World,” held at Fordham Lincoln Center on Saturday May 4, that–combined with Matt Gold’s lecture–made the value of DH unquestionable to me.  This event, chaired by KSAA president Stuart Curran and hosted at Fordham by professors Sarah Zimmerman and John Bugg, brought in teams of scholars to present three enormous DH projects in Romantic studies. Morris Eaves and Rachel Lee of the University of Rochester presented The William Blake Archive, whose inception predates the advent of the Internet. They shared the challenges that have emerged throughout the project, including the most recent efforts to decode and encode Blake’s manuscript “Vala” (aka “The Four Zoas”). Laura Mandell, Associate Director of NINES, and Lynda Pratt of the University of Nottingham described their efforts to digitize the 7000 letters of Robert Southey on Romantic Circles. Mandell demonstrated a tool designed to map relationships among the people Southey wrote to and about so that we might apply principles of network theory to confirm and challenge our views about Romantic sociability.  Elizabeth Denlinger, curator of the Pforzheimer Collection at the New York Public Library, along with David Brookshire and Neil Fraistat of the University of Maryland, took us behind the scenes of the Shelley-Godwin Archive project, which among other things will bring Mary Shelley’s hand-written Frankenstein into public view.

Thanks to these projects, crumbling manuscripts that were once available only to credentialed scholars will now be on line and, if all goes as apparently planned, open to all at no cost beyond an internet connection.  For the most part, the people who spoke at the Keats-Shelley symposium are not emerging scholars trying to make their mark in a competitive field.  Rather, they are accomplished professors who could easily have had a comfortable tenured existence in the ancien régime of print.  They are acting on a vision of different possibilities, and their efforts represent the perfect Romantic paradox of conservation and radical change.  They admitted challenges and risks, including: the high cost of “hidden labor” that makes these sites look deceptively easy, the frequent disconnect between technological ambition and resources, and the possibilities of unintended consequences.  (Allusions to Frankenstein’s creature abounded.)  But their generosity in opening their worlds and inviting others in with no fears of what Edmund Burke referred to as the “swinish multitude,” was beautiful and Romantic in all the best ways.  When the speakers displayed a page of .html code, it no longer looked like Greek to me, but rather like a poetic language I wanted to understand and use.

In designing a course that I called “Romanticizing Revolution,” I included a unit on today’s technology revolution at the center of the syllabus. It followed a unit on British texts from the period of the French Revolution and another on the American Sixties and preceded units on the so-called “Arab Spring” and the Occupy Movement.  In her introduction to my course’s introductory text, Burke, Paine, Godwin, and the Revolution Controversy (Cambridge University Press, 1984-1992) Romantic scholar Marilyn Butler suggests that the revolutionary fervor apparent in England in the late 1700s “did not disappear but [went] underground” in the repressive 1790s and was transformed into polemical prose pamphlets and what we now call Romantic poetry. As my students and I read texts such as Eric Raymond’s essay “The Cathedral and the Bazaar” and Just for Fun: The Story of an Accidental Revolutionary by Linus Torvalds, the source behind open source software, I began to wonder whether code is our new Romantic poetry. In a manner analogous to Butler’s claim about the emerging print culture, the emerging digital culture marks the return of the revolutionary fervor of the 1960s and 70s after the backlash of the 80s.  Although I hope to keep teaching Romantic literature, I will probably never write like William Wordsworth or Mary Robinson did.  But this past week gave me a Romantic hope that I might one day, as a participatory DH-er, help produce some code that contributes to keeping the works of this period alive.

 

Looking Ahead for Next Year

The Fordham Graduate Student Digital Humanities Group had a great inaugural year, one that ended on a high note with our guest speaker, Matt Gold. To see all the things we did, go to the Past Events page. Read about Mary Anne Myer‘s experiences with this group’s activities and beyond. For 2013-14, we will build on our activities by offering more of the same, including discussions and workshops to help teachers and students use technology in teaching and research, as well as nationally-recognized speakers. We also plan to add a few things, such as supporting those who wish to learn to code and hackathons.

In September, Patrick Burns will lead a discussion of Matthew Jocker’s book, Macroanalysis. This discussion will be accompanied by a month-long tutorial on topic modeling, designed by Patrick. (Read more about topic modeling here.) Check here for more information about that and follow us on Facebook. We constantly add updates about the group as well as other interesting things about the digital humanities in general.

For Fall 2013
>>Informal gathering of people will meet on campus to teach themselves how to code.
>>Zotero workshop
>>WordPress for course management workshop
>>Nominate two new HASTAC Scholars for 2013-14
>>Syllabi Hackathon
>>Wikipedia Hackathon
>>Plan a one-day DH conference for graduate students.
>>Plan a half-day workshop for graduate students on some aspect of digital humanities methods and practices for research, publishing, and pedagogy.

“Teaching to the Network: Digital Humanities and Public Pedagogy” Matt Gold Gives Talk at Fordham

In part 2 of the FGSDH Group’s Teaching and Research with Technology Series, Matt Gold, from the CUNY Graduate Center and editor of Debates in the Digital Humanities, will give a talk over lunch. It is entitled, “Teaching to the Network: Digital Humanities and Public Pedagogy.” Graduate students, faculty, staff, and anyone else with an interest in teaching and the digital humanities, are welcome.

The details:

May 1, 12:00-2:00, Walsh Library, O’Hare Special Collections (fourth floor).

Please sign up here for the event through your Fordham email account, so we know how many people will be there for lunch.

This event is made possible by Fordham University’s Center for Teaching Excellence.

Omeka Workshop Was A Success

The vast digital humanities tent can seem overwhelming at times. The easier path would be to sit by the pleasant campfire at the site next door and toast marshmallows. But as 15 Fordham University faculty and graduate students learned during the Omeka workshop on April 3, the barrier to entry into the tent is quite low. Alex Gil, Columbia University’s Digital Scholarship Coordinator, did a terrific job leading the workshop.

Alex Gil, Digital Scholarship Coordinator, Columbia University
Alex Gil, Digital Scholarship Coordinator, Columbia University

Omeka, as Wikipedia defines it, is a free, open source, content management system for online collections. It was developed by the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University, and was given a technology collaboration award by the Andrew Mellon Foundation.  Omeka is used by researchers, archivists, museum curators, students, and teachers.

For this workshop, Alex showed us a few notable sites–or exhibits, as they’re called–that use Omeka, including “Lincoln at 200,” a collaborative project involving the Newberry Library, the Chicago History Museum, and the Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission. Then he carefully walked us through the procedure for creating an Omeka exhibit. Workshop participants brought a diverse collection of material to work on: from medieval manuscripts to pre-Columbian art to personal photographs.

The group felt so enthusiastic about Omeka, that a few participants have decided to reconvene in a few weeks and help each other develop their work. Marshmallows will be served. If you missed the workshop and want to learn more about Omeka, you’re welcome to join us. More details coming soon.

The Omeka Workshop was sponsored by the Center for Teaching Excellence and the Fordham Graduate Student Digital Humanities Group.

Omeka Workshop Participants
Omeka Workshop Participants

Getting Academic Things Done: How to Utilize Innovative Digital Tools, April 10

Think there might be a better way to use technology to aid your research? Learn how with Jon Stanfill, Fordham’s 2012-13 HASTAC Scholar and fifth-year theology grad student, who will lead a short workshop about organizing an efficient digital workflow for research, writing, and increased productivity. He will demonstrate how he is utilizing tools such as Devonthink, Notational Velocity (nvalt), Sente, TextExpander, and Omnifocus. He will also discuss how to overcome technological obstacles, as well as leave time for Q&A and for you to share your own tips for using technology for research and teaching.

Wednesday, April 10th from 2:30-4:00pm @ Duane 140